Sunday, September 5, 2010

Labor Day 2010: not much to celebrate

In a Washington Post column Katrina vanden Heuvel writes:

Labor Day this year comes draped in mourning. More than half of all workers have experienced a spell of unemployment, taken a cut in pay or hours, been forced to go part-time or seen other such problems during and after the Great Recession. Collapsing stock and house prices have destroyed a fifth of the wealth of the average household. Nearly six in ten Americans have canceled or cut back on holidays. Amidst all this, workers increasingly don't even have labor unions as a potential answer to their insecurities -- despite the fact that, of all the institutions in America, they more often than not got it right on the big issues facing the country, generally in the face of a bipartisan political and elite consensus.


Unions are in trouble. They represent less than 13 percent of the workforce and less than 8 percent of private workers. Union workers still receive higher wages and are more likely to have employer-provided health insurance, pensions and paid sick leave than non-union workers. But when unions represented over 33 percent of all private workers in the 1940s, they drove wage increases for everyone -- non-union firms had to compete for good workers. Now, unions struggle just to defend their members' wages and benefits. Over the past decade before the Great Recession, productivity soared, profits rose and CEO pay skyrocketed, but most workers lost ground.

Unions face constant attacks from corporations and conservatives. The most recent campaign -- designed as always to divide workers from one another -- assails the pay and particularly the pensions of public employees. Why should they have pensions, when many workers have lost theirs and get, at best, a retirement savings plan at work? In fact, in a civilized society, we would ask the reverse question. How do we create pensions -- beyond Social Security -- for workers across the economy, leveling up, rather than down?

Indeed, if we had listened to unions more often in the past, America wouldn't be in the predicament it's in now.

The entire piece is worth reading and it is linked here.

3 comments:

Bolar said...

Hi Mike,

Thanks for the great post. Tuff times indeed...I am not a expert on world economics. What can we the people of the U.S.A. do to get rid of NAFTA? My research indicates that we have a way to big government that is out of control and does not have the best interest of our country in mind... We are being invaded by illegal immigrants that are a major drain on our countrys already strained resources... We have a president that will not provide his birth certificate... Our founding fathers are rolling in there graves as the constitution is being trampled... So tragic indeed... I am not a rep. or a dem., just a very concerned citizen.

Beat regards,

Bolar

yanmaneee said...

coach outlet
golden goose outlet
coach outlet
yeezy boost 350
michael kors outlet online
adidas tubular
nike air max 270
coach handbags
kd 11
offwhite

thysaez said...

this content https://www.dolabuy.co check this buy replica bags online you could try this out Dolabuy Balenciaga